Can we trust our leaders? - Henley Business School Finland

Can we trust our leaders?

Boris Johnsonโ€™s โ€˜Partygateโ€™ and the ensuing publication of the Gray Report has led to an erosion of public trust in his leadership. In our latest Leading Insight, Professors Andrew and Nada Kakabadse summarise the PMโ€™s key failures of leadership.

Is it normal to expect that we should, and can, trust our leaders in a modern era of โ€˜fake news,โ€™ politically-biased media, click-bait, depleting attention spans, and a near-endless litany of corporate malfeasance?

In short, are we being taken for fools by our leaders?

An increasing catalogue of surveys suggests that we most definitely do not trust politicians, or business leaders, heads of state, charities, or even the church.

But how has this sorry state of affairs come about? Allow us to summarise the key failings as evidenced by the storm surrounding Prime Minister Boris Johnson and the impacts of โ€˜Partygate‘.


During Prime Ministerโ€™s Questions, Boris Johnson seemingly committed himself to full disclosure of the Gray Report. Well, not quite. Few believe he will willingly and transparently share anything controversial which concerns him directly. It is now commonplace for him to make a statement that then directly contrasts with his actions. This has become the new normal. Most leaders speak and act with sincerity, but expediency is increasingly taking over as inconsistency becomes the natural response.

Bobbing, weaving and rolling with the punches

Our leaders are accustomed to ducking and diving uncomfortable and obvious truths as a way of handling challenges. But how far can public credulity be stretched? A multitude of modern interest groups have learnt that in order to make headway, leveraging political lobbying is the way forward. Think Brexitโ€™s leave campaign on steroids. Grabbing headlines is the priority and leaders give paramount importance to continually engaging with, and being visible to, their primary audiences. As political interests grow and spread, so does the rate of slipping and side-stepping the issues, all in the name of retaining stakeholder trust. In private, most leaders despair. They know that all of their efforts to maintain trust, at best, minimise the loss and, at worse, lose it completely.

Making it personal

How best to capture the headlines? Make your comments personal and aim to achieve maximum damage. Dominic Cummingsโ€™ more direct attacks on Boris have resulted in the most attention. Even Sue Grayโ€™s investigation into the alleged parties at No. 10 during the height of the COVID-19 crisis was recently caricatured as a tin of paint, โ€˜the grey that covers everything โ€“ Sue Gray.โ€™ She has withstood this intolerance and time will tell the degree to which she is trusted. Perhaps the most damaging personal attack of all has come from governments around the world in their portrayal of those who resist mandatory vaccination. Aside from being the most basic of human rights abuses, dictating to citizens what they should do with their body, and treating them as a scourge of society, generates deep and long-lasting resentment and betrayal. Whatever the undoubted benefits of vaccination, trust is irrevocably damaged when the issue is made personal.

Who can we trust?

Ever growing misalignments of interests are normal, as are leaders acting inconsistently. Ironically, strong and consistent avoidance of apparent truths ultimately gains widespread respect, because the perception of such behaviour is that the individual displays โ€˜strength.โ€™ Today, the leader who is trusted most is the one who, above all else, focuses their entire body and spirit on realising that one, fundamental goal. They are at all times undeterred, and this is seen as being critical to the communityโ€™s future.

For Boris Johnson, it is Brexit. This, he tells us all, is the mechanism that will ultimately generate the future wealth of the UK and a majority have bought into this promise. Despite all the scandals, once the latest furore dies down, it is likely that the media and other leading societal voices will convince us that Boris is the only leader possessing the strength needed to drive forward the UKโ€™s grand ambitions. Whether this is ethical or not, it is the clearly-focused leader who displays resilience and steadfastly avoids being side-tracked, who will be trusted to command.

Professori Andrew Kakabadse - Henley Business School Suomessa

Professor Andrew Kakabadse

Professor Andrew Kakabadse is Professor of Governance & Leadership, Programme Director for the Board Directorsโ€™ Programme and Boardroom Skills programme as well as Chairman of the Henley Directorsโ€™ Forum. He has undertaken global studies spanning over 20,000 organisations (in the private, public and third sector) and 41 countries. His research focuses on the areas of board performance, governance, leadership and policy.

Related content

10 reasons why longer training programs are more effective

  • 9 Mar 2023
Iโ€™m a professional trainer and most of my trainingย is one day courses. During my Henley EMBA studies Iโ€™ve had a chance to compare the delivery and impact of my shorter training to the longer training programs that Henley provides. This post serves as a reflection about those differences.

21st Century Digital Marketing on the Greenlands Campus

  • 14 Feb 2023
The Henley Global EMBA offers an opportunity to select one elective module on a topic where you want to deepen your knowledge and skills. I chose to do my elective in Digital Marketing. I was curious to see how up-to-date and relevant information a business school can provide about this rapidly evolving topic.

The ROI of EMBA for the employer

  • 19 Jan 2023
In order to consider the program to be a worthwhile investment for the company, business leaders and HR professionals need to understand the value of the training, and in particular the return-on-investment (ROI) of an EMBA. Read Juho Toivolaยดs blog post what are the long term benefits of the investment and how to calculate the actual ROI of EMBA.