Skip to content
What questions should be at the heart of leadership in a business school? - Henley Business School Finland

What questions should be at the heart of leadership in a business school?

What is leadership for? This is not a new question, or an answered one. Academics have so many ways of framing responses to this question that managers may justly ask how they are supposed to know which one to study in order to become a good leader. So perhaps we need to think again.

If leadership is made real through actions, or through sets of actions, then it follows that certain actions may be defined as leadership while others may not. There are conventions about which we can all agree. Leadership is therefore not entirely subjective and in the eye of the beholder, nor is it random. If it were either, weโ€™d have no basis on which to agree what a leader is.

But is it possible to explain leadership using theory? And if it is, how should this be done? Is it who the leader is that counts? Or is it the type action or set of actions that matter? Or is it just a matter of context (the all-powerful โ€œit dependsโ€)? Questions such as these are the bread and butter of leadership study in business schools (endless rounds of intellectual tag are played out in journals and at conferences). The field of leadership as a subject domain is a morass of minute and bewilderingly trivial differences between social science theories. It does make for a landscape every bit as bewildering and unyielding as the Lilliputian divide, in Swiftโ€™s Gulliverโ€™s Travels, between big-enders and little-enders on how to open a boiled egg.

How far does all this get us toward answering what leadership is for?

Not far enough. Leadership theory and practice have each become rather centred on addressing two questions:

1. โ€œWho is in charge?โ€ (or, โ€œwho should be in charge?โ€) and

2. โ€œWhat is the best way for those in charge to arrange things?โ€ 

These both feel pragmatic and fit nicely with the idea that good leadership = good leader, which is the notion that if you get the who and the what right and the rest will follow. Yet this is only one aspect of a much more complex reality. These questions often end up being about fitting in and maintaining the status quo, whereas leadership ought to stand out, rock the boat, and explore the new. I argue that leadership is about two other questions as well.

3. โ€œWhat could be?โ€               

This is about change, vision and possibility, and now that, for example, the climate crisis has arrived as a present-tense issue it could be about a paradigmatic change to the business model of the global economy. This is, perhaps, where leadership theory is now โ€“ at the cutting edge and making some progress โ€“ although with a few exceptions it is still stuck in outdated ideas of what a leader is. There is, I also believe, another task for the business school, and in fact the whole university, and another question for leadership study to form. Here is my attempt:

4. โ€œWhat are the consequences of our actions?โ€

Fitting our environment to suit human needs, our tried and tested way of defining progress, can have all sorts of unintended consequences. It may now be leading to the destruction of the environment itself. The business school can help with awareness not so much in terms of WHAT to do but HOW to think. Awareness is key here because itโ€™s the one thing most managers lack as they consider their next actions.

Training leaders to impose narrow solutions on present problem without also educating them to use their imaginations to foresee and deal with the future effects does no-one a service.

Written by Dr Chris Dalton

Chris is Associate Professor of Management Learning and Subject Area Leader for Personal Development at Henley. He has over 24 years of experience in management education and training. Chris teaches on the MBA and runs corporate workshops and seminars related to management development in many parts of the world, including South Africa, central Europe and the Middle East. His research is focused on the use of Reflection in Personal Development in post-experience Management Education.

Related content

Pia Forsell

Leader in spotlight: Pia Aaltonen-Forsell, CFO

  • 7 Jul 2023
Pia Aaltonen-Forsell is CFO of Outokumpu, the largest stainless steal producer in Europe. She does not have the most obvious background for a CFO: she is Master of Social Sciences in economics. She thinks that her background is a great asset, since as a CFO you need to understand the economy in general, not just business.ย 
The social aspect of learning - Henley Business School Finland

The work life value of research skills

  • 22 May 2023
One of the key sets of skills that are strengthened during the Henley EMBA journey are research skills. These are particularly necessary in the composition of the final thesis. But what is the work life relevance of academic research skills? How can I benefit from the research experience in my everyday work?
WACC, CoC and IRR โ€“ a psychologistโ€™s guide to corporate finance - Henley Business School Finland

What have I learned about myself during the Henley EMBA?

  • 17 Apr 2023
The EMBA programme in general and the Personal Development module has been a great opportunity to constructively challenge my views and beliefs about myself. Iโ€™ve found myself increasingly disagreeing with some identity labels that I previously considered useful and accurate.